The problem of evil is a touchstone of any religion from our direct confrontation with evil results suffering, and thus endless questions about the meaning of life that is why all religions have to give a proper answer regarding the origin, nature and end of evil. Leibniz on the problem of evil first published sun jan 4, 1998 substantive revision wed feb 27, 2013 nevertheless, that even if the existence of god and the existence of evil should prove to be compatible, the existence (or duration, or amount, or pervasiveness) of evil provides us at the very least with compelling circumstantial. Essays, is the existence of evil compatible with the existence of god term papers, is the existence of evil compatible with the existence of god research paper, book reports 184 990 essays, term and research papers available for unlimited access. Why horrible suffering does not disprove god's existence trent horn august 21, 2015 “there is a fairly compelling argument for the view that the existence of evil is logically consistent with the existence of the theistic god” this suffering seems more compatible with an absent god than with a purposefully inactive one. Can someone put this in other words for me or at least explain it to me i'm suppose to argue that evil is not compatible to god's existence, but for some reason i keep having trouble understanding it/getting confused it's for my philosophy.
An attempt to show that there is a morally sufficient reason which explains why the o-god permit evil or otherwise why the existence of the o-god and the existence of evil are logically compatible four standard theodicies. Others, drawing a distinction between a theodicy and a more limited “defense,” have sought to show only that the existence of some evil in the world is logically compatible with god’s omnipotence and perfect goodness. Consider the epicurean argument: is god willing to prevent evil, but not able then he is not omnipotent is he able, but not willing then he is malevolent is he both able and willing then whence cometh evil is he neither able nor willing then why call him god i was reading in wikipedia that one of the most common arguments against the existence of a specific god is the problem of. Reasonable faith podcast reasonable faith is a conversational program dealing with the most important apologetic questions of our day.
The argument from evil (or problem of evil) is the argument that an all-powerful, all-knowing, and perfectly good god would not allow any—or certain kinds of—evil or suffering to occur unlike the logical argument from evil, which holds that the existence of god (so defined) is logically. The following essay describes the problem of evil in relation to god, examines christian responses to the problem, and concludes the existence of god and the existence of evil are fully compatible body “the problem of evil is often divided between the logical and evidential problems. An anti-theodicist is someone who does not believe that god and the existence of evil are compatible an atheist can be a theodicist since the fact that god and evil are compatible and their coexistence is logically possible is not proof that god exists. Although the existence of god and evil may not necessarily be logically and evidentially compatible, i believe that god is necessary for many people across the world to understand why evil and suffering occurs and to have someone to blame.
One of the classic objections to the existence of a monotheistic god is the existence of evil and suffering if god has the properties of omnipotence (supreme. The main issue concerning evil and suffering in the world is the contradictions with god’s qualities god is supposedly omnipotent and omniscient, however evil and suffering exist. How can the existence of evil be compatible with the existence of god(s) tooth fairy or between evil and god like apples and oranges, they both exist as things unto themselves - neither compatible nor incompatible how can the amount of evil and purposelessness in the world be compatible with the existence of god what.
(lecture material, chap 3) ~ the existence of god and the existence of evil are not compatible (page 28) 18 in the problem of evil, the evidentiary problem is what (lecture material chapter 3) ~ whether or not god and evil are logically compatible it still seems that the existence of evil is evidence against the existence of god. Logical problem of evil the existence of evil and suffering in our world seems to pose a serious challenge to belief in the existence of a perfect god if god were all-knowing, it seems that god would know about all of the horrible things that happen in our world so that the free will defense can be shown to be compatible with theistic. Alvin plantinga's free will defense is a logical argument developed by american analytic philosopher alvin plantinga, the john a o'brien professor of philosophy emeritus at the university of notre dame, and published in its final version in his 1977 book god, freedom, and evil.
P3´: the best possible world may contain some soul-building evil-that is, evil that is necessary for the existence of good traits of character, such as charity, compassion, and bravery and it may contain some evil that was required for there to be free agents in the world. That is, the question of whether or not the existence of evil is compatible with the existence of an all-knowing all-powerful and wholly good god in addressing this issue plantinga focuses on the question of whether evil and god can logically co-exist - it is not a theodicy which seeks to explain the existence of evil. The problem of evil and the free will defence the argument for the existence of evil to be logically incompatible with the existence of god, we have a theodicy is an argument which tries to make evil compatible with the existence of an omnipotent, good god perhaps the most famous theodicy is the free will defence.